Gynecologists advocate for a balanced approach amidst debate on the impact of menstrual leave on women's workforce participation.

The Supreme Court's expressed concern over the mandatory setting up of menstrual leaves has sparked a nationwide debate, most of which has negative impacts on women’s participation in the workplace. The court questioned the necessity of such leaves, highlighting that this could lead to women being excluded from employment opportunities.

Gynecologists and experts’ in women's health have raised concerns, offering varied reasons and perspectives. Dr. Manjusha Goel, the Lead Consultant at the CK Birla Hospital in Delhi, acknowledged the draining effects of menstrual pain every woman goes through in her daily life. She also argued that such leaves could provide essential relief and support; their necessary implementation must be approached thoughtfully. There is a reasonable fear that such implementation might perpetuate gender stereotypes and discourage women from being employed.

Supporting a nuanced approach, Dr. Apurva Gupta, Consultant at Daffodils by Artemis, EOK, suggested a few alternative strategies like remote work, adjustable hours, and so on. She highlighted the importance of education and awareness in workplaces to destigmatize menstruation and create a supportive environment for women.

As the discussions continue, there is a need for a balanced approach that prioritizes women's health while safeguarding their professional advancements. The Supreme Court’s cautionary stance prompts a reconsideration of how policies must be implemented to avoid unintended consequences for gender equality in the workforce. Achieving this balance is crucial for genuine progress towards gender equity in employment practices.